It has been revealed that millions of New Zealand taxpayer dollars have been donated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) to Hillary Clinton’s charity, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), a non-profit organisation created from the Clinton Foundation with the stated goal to reduce HIV/AIDs in Africa.

An MFAT spokesman confirmed to the NBR that between January 2010 and June 2016, $7.7 million of taxpayer funds had already been donated and another $6 million was to follow, keeping to a pledge to donate $13.7 million made by the government organisation in 2013.

ACT party member David Seymour commented “In a world where New Zealanders can crowdsource to buy a beach, it’s not clear what role there is for the government to collect taxes and contribute it to a global charity which is more than capable of reaching out and raising its own money.”

The big question is, why is our government sending millions of dollars overseas while at the same time cutting funding for crucial services which desperately need the money here in New Zealand?

To fully understand how Clinton charities operate and decide whether a single taxpayer dollar should have been donated, we first need to look at some of the controversies.

Over the past 15 years, the Washington Post can reveal the charities have raised over $2 billion dollars, mainly from big corporates, foreign governments and political donors. Many have called the contributions ‘pay for play’, where powerful donors exchange funds for future political favours. Speeches make up a large part of the revenue stream, with the Clintons earning hundreds of thousands per speech from the likes of big Wall Street banks including Goldman Sachs as revealed by WikiLeaks.

Clinton’s charity has confirmed that in 2012, Qatar donated US $1 million to the Clinton Foundation raising a question of ethics after Hillary promised that while she was serving as secretary of the state donations from foreign governments would no longer be accepted due to the potential influence on foreign policy.

It was also been revealed the Clinton charities utilised the devastating Haiti earthquake to implement disaster capitalism, funneling funds into Haiti under the pretense of aid but only for the funds to flow away from the Haitians desperately in need and instead to companies who had made previously large donations to the Clinton Foundation.

Then there is the $145 million ‘pay for play’ contributions made to the Clinton Foundation by shareholders of Canadian company Uranium One, a mining company with concessions in Kazakhstan and the US. Uranium One sought to sell these concessions to the Russians, but the deal had to be approved by a government committee due to the implications to national security.

In return for the contributions and the extra $500,000 Bill Clinton received in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank, the 20% purchase of US uranium assets by the Russians was approved, knowing this purchase would mean the production of more nuclear weapons against America’s own interests.

The Clinton Health Access Initiative has also had its share of controversy.

US Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn recently released a 71 page report which slammed CHAI’s “self-serving” philanthropy in Africa, after the charity was found distributing watered down HIV/AIDS medications to sick Africans.

According to the report, these cheaper drugs which were provided by Ranbaxy Laboratories “subjected patients to increased risks of morbidity and mortality”. Ranbaxy later was found guilty of selling badly made generic drugs and fined a record US$500 million.

If Hillary is elected president, she has committed to changing how the Clinton Foundation operates. Bill Clinton has said “The Foundation will accept contributions only from U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and U.S.-based independent foundations, whose names we will continue to make public on a quarterly basis. And we will change the official name from the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation to the Clinton Foundation. While I will continue to support the work of the Foundation, I will step down from the Board and will no longer raise funds for it.”

However, CHAI, which receives around 60% of the funds from the Clinton Foundation, has yet to decide whether it will also refuse foreign government donations if she was to win, and when asked for comment on CHAI the Clinton campaign spokesman declined.

There’s no doubt the Clinton charities have done some incredible work overseas through CHAI, but the manner in which these charities are utilised as vehicles for personal benefit can not be ignored. With strong financial ties to Wall Street, big pharmaceuticals and other large corporate sponsors, it’s clear the charities are being used as avenues to channel funds under the guise of philanthropy.

What is of great concern here in New Zealand is the level of taxpayer funded donations made to Hillary’s charity without public knowledge, and how quiet the mainstream media has been about it.

John Key and the National Party clearly have no issue using millions of taxpayer funds as bribes, revealed by the corrupt Saudi sheep deal, so it should be of no surprise to see the government fund a shady charity found to be acting only for ‘self serving’ interests.

We need to hold our government accountable for where taxpayer funds are being applied, especially when gifted to charities operated by corrupt American political figureheads.

Our country currently can not afford to be sending millions of dollars overseas. Instead of donating the remaining $6 million pledged to CHAI, we demand that MFAT reallocate the funds within New Zealand to help assist those struggling under our poverty and homelessness crisis.

For an excellent review of the Clinton Foundation, please have a read through the Washington Post’s feature ‘Inside the Clinton Donor Network’.

We also highly recommend watching the in-depth documentary ‘Clinton Cash’, which discusses the ‘pay for play’ model and resulting corruption which can be viewed here.

28 Responses

  1. carl peterson

    The Clintons have been revealed as Satanist, child abusers, and most probably as murderers; to say nothing of being proven pyschopathic liars. Wikileaks has never lied. John Key is gone, and none too soon. How much of New Zealand has he given away in the name of philanthropy- or rather, ass licking to the New World Order elite?

    Reply
    • matthew elliotte

      John Key learnt his trade in america working for merrill Lynch. Goldman sachs and he did a cadetship atv the federal reserve. This means he is a full blown lackey for the large america corrupt corporates.
      He got into politics here in newzwealand as he was meant to be, assisted by Michele Boag. This was aplanned move by his bosses in america as he is a commited globalist and came back here to sow their seeds of globalism.
      He is democrat lackey and basically worked for the democrats while prime minister of newzealand.
      Within a week of his retirement as PM he was in Hawii playing golf with Obama, another corrupt deocrat.
      John key does not give a toss about the well being of newzealand and we are well rid of the prick.

      Reply
  2. New Zealand prime minister John Key resigns | ukgovernmentwatch

    […] November 3, 2016 It has been revealed that millions of New Zealand taxpayer dollars have been donated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) to Hillary Clinton’s charity, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), a non-profit organisation created from the Clinton Foundation with the stated goal to reduce HIV/AIDs in Africa. https://www.wakeupnz.net/13-7m-nz-taxpayer-funds-donated-shady-clinton-charity/ […]

    Reply
  3. TruthaboutPizza

    Are you aware that there is an enormous scandal breaking on the Clinton Foundation – regarding Human Trafficking and Pedophilia? #Pizzagate MSM in America is full force trying to cover this up by attacking it as “false news” – censorship of youtube, reddit, twitter, etc. top level info here: https://i.sli.mg/eoWIeB.jpg Perhaps this is why your PM has resigned.

    Reply
    • Paula

      Shame the link doesn’t work. I was also told that Key was trying to limit peoples rights so that they couldn’t claim personal sovereignty, de-registering themselves from the government system and re-claiming themselves from the Vatican. Not heard? – look it up, after all personal sovereignty is all about due diligence.

      Reply
  4. bro_ow

    The real problem here is how global development money has to be sent through organizations like CHAI since the traditional state actors have been dismantled. It may surprise you to know we don’t have professional development and health workers that spend and work with our OID aid money. It is channeled through INGOs (like CHAI) or even worse for non for profit development organizations (AKA consultant umbrella groups that make tons of cash) such as FHI360. CHAI does good work, I personally know people doing HIV work that hate the Clinton’s, but love CHAI.
    The reality here is that you guys really have a unsophisticated understanding of how the world works, that doesn’t mean media isn’t cover this story (there are actual stories the media doesn’t cover, but this stuff is not one of them) it means you don’t understand what you are talking about.

    Reply
  5. Greg Allan

    “Hillary Clinton’s charity, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), a non-profit organisation created from the Clinton Foundation with the stated goal to reduce HIV/AIDs in Africa.”

    This is a group who are forcing genital mutilation upon little African boys.

    Reply
  6. Kim Falconer

    ok, so i’ve read the Washington Post article, & i’m still thinking “So what” ??? The Clinton’s are spectacularly good at raising money. Two thirds goes to their charity. The charity therefore has, & does, spend a huge amount of money on genuinely excellent causes. Is there supposed to be some sort of scandal here ~ just because it’s got Clinton’s name attached?? Whether it’s appropriate for the NZ govt to be donating to 1 specific charity over another may be a valid question. But many, many people have spent enormous effort over the past 35 yr.s flinging accusations at HRC (mostly “You’re woman, why don’t you sit down & be quiet?!”) & still haven’t managed to show corruption or ‘evil’ intent. Just because Fox News says it’s so a hundred times a week still doesn’t make it so…..

    Reply
    • Andy

      Yes. The Clinton Foundation is one of the most corrupt if not the most corrupt so-called charitable organization in the world.
      The Clintons will be prosecuted backed by masses of evidence already on record and those in New Zealand who have given tax payer money should be stepped down and held accountable also.

      Reply
    • Anon

      I wouldn’t mind taking home 1/3 of a $13.7 million. That my friend is called money laundering. You pay for a seat at their table and you get to retire with a $400,000 a year salary, all expenses paid (housing, food, drivers, maids, etc) as an ambassador.

      Reply
    • Haha

      If you seriously have high regard for The Clinton Foundation, I suggest you open a book and educate yourself on that insanely shady completely corrupted organization.

      Reply
    • Eric

      “Geniinely excellent causes” such as enriching the Clintons and their associates, paying huge salaries and excessive travel expenses. The Doug Band / John Podesta emails cover a lot of the impropriety of the Foundations operations. Nice try Hillary bot.

      Reply
    • Isaac

      I don’t think you know enough about the Clinton Foundation, while they say they are a humanitarian charity their records paint a different picture.

      The Clinton foundation is a front for the Clinton pay to play system, you need to do more research Kim, it has nothing to do with her gender.

      http://fmovies.to/film/clinton-cash.jxyy

      Reply
    • Archibald david

      http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-clinton-foundation-isnt-a-charity-its-a-political-slush-fund-for-influence-peddling/
      http://sentinel.ht/2016/07/26/hillary-belongs-jail-haitians-dnc/
      http://investmentwatchblog.com/haitians-protest-outside-hillary-clintons-office-over-billions-stolen-by-clinton-foundation/ Haitian activists protested outside of the Clinton Foundation in New York over the loss of “billions of dollars” that was meant to help rebuild after the devastating 2010 earthquake. The activists are claiming the money was stolen through the Haiti Reconstruction Commission that was headed by Bill Clinton. In January 2015, the Clinton Foundation was the target of protests for wasting more than $10 billion and awarding contracts to non-Haitian companies. The activists also said Haiti as a cover for foreign governments to funnel kickbacks of hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. They believe that this was done for favors that Hillary was doing for the foreign governments while she was Secretary of State. “We are telling the world of the crimes that Bill and Hillary Clinton are responsible for in Haiti,” said Dhoud Andre of the Committee Against Dictatorship in Haiti. “And we are telling the American people that the over 32,000 emails that Hillary Clinton said she deleted have evidence of the crimes they have committed.”
      xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      The “CLINTON FOUNDATION for Laundering Bribes and Enriching the Clintons”
      Published on Jul 24, 2016–15 mins. How much money has the Clinton Foundation raised globally? Wall Street financial expert Charles Ortel says it’s a “$100 billion criminal conspiracy” and goes on to say, “I think it is a disgrace. To put that number into perspective, depending on how you look at the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme, that was either $40 billion to $60 billion. This is $100 billion, and maybe more.” How much Clinton Foundation money actually makes it to charitable causes? Ortel says, “It’s impossible to tell from the filings. You are supposed to tell from the filings, and it’s impossible to tell. One of the biggest expenses in the recent period in the Clinton Foundation is for Pharmaceuticals for supposedly fighting HIV Aids. If this were a well-run charity, you would provide a detailed breakdown of what pharmaceuticals by type and at what price. There is none of that disclosure. You don’t know if that pharmaceutical number is completely made up or not. You have no way of telling, and the auditors have never done their work. This is why I say this is a text book case study in global charity fraud. It needs to be exposed as such.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b0EZPjUvBc LOCK THEM UP !

      The “CLINTON FOUNDATION for Laundering Bribes and Enriching the Clintons”
      is sitting on over $600MILLION dollars that should be turned over to HELP People and FIX inner city problems. http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=39508 The Clintons claim that money is to help people ,,,,, but it is just SITTING in THEIR BANK ACCOUNT, their CANADIAN bank account, they set up their “charity” in CANADA !!!. Put it to use it is needed NOW! Seeing all that money go right to the poor will fill Hillary’s heart with JOY. Amassing that much money is actually the definition of corruption since the income was from entities doing business with, reliant on or facilitated by the federal government. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2946899/Clinton-foundation-received-81million-donations-scandal-hit-HSBC-Swiss-bank.html Hillary IS “the GREAT WHORE of BABYLON” wallowing on her fat back, ankles wide, begging for coins from any passerby. Filthy disgusting, degenerate, diseased. http://www.govtslaves.info/clinton-charity-spends-nearly-80-percent-on-administrative-costs/
      http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/bombshell-report-crooked-hillary-took-100-million-from-middle-east-regimes-massive-conflicts-of-interest_05122016 National Security Analyst Patrick Poole says the amount of cash donated to the Clintons is “simply unprecedented.” “These regimes are buying access. You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension,” Poole told The Daily Caller.

      Reply
    • kat

      As you can see, the hired trolls for Clinton are still out there to let us all know how reasonable and helpful the Clinton foundation is. You may also want to note that the links to every news piece, except for this one, lead to 404 – File or directory not found.

      Reply
    • matthew elliotte

      Kim Falconer, your an idiot, defending a criminal like hillary wow your sooooo dumb.
      Do a bit of research on the clintons , go back to when they were a leagal team and the white water scandal. Read sbout bills cocain interests and all the cocain bosses he pardone while presiden, read about all his sex escapades against young women, try to understand why james comey didnt prsecute hillary fro treason, I,ll give you a hint she corrupted the FBI and its still corrupt, just wake up you idiot and admit she bill the foundation is a corrupt tool for them to extort steal and use moiney for their personal gain.

      Reply
  7. Harmon Wilfred

    https://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/us-help-deport-wilfred-sought

    Thursday, 27 October 2016
    US help to deport Wilfred sought
    By David Williams
    The Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse.has repeatedly asked for United States help to deport a stateless businessman living near Christchurch.
    Harmon Wilfred, who lives in Lincoln and claims to be a CIA whistleblower, fled to New Zealand in 2001 after what he calls threats to his personal safety and freedom.
    He renounced his US citizenship in 2005 after the Government rejected his attempts to stay. In 2011, he was served with a deportation order.
    Official documents released to the Otago Daily Times show the Government has been pushing the US to help remove Mr Wilfred.
    A briefing paper written in June for Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse reveals officials have held talks with US consulate and embassy officials about Mr Wilfred.
    The discussions were ”to explore the possibility of an arrangement whereby Mr Wilfred could be deported and allowed entry into the US”, the June 3 ”aide memoire”, written by Immigration New Zealand manager Michael Carley, said.
    The paper noted: ”These engagements did not produce any result of substance.”
    Mr Woodhouse’s private secretary, whose name was redacted, asked for the paper to be prepared before Mr Woodhouse’s meeting with US ambassador Mark Gilbert on June 9.
    The paper was to cover ”high level messaging relating to Mr Wilfred, as I’m sure it will be raised”.
    Messrs Woodhouse and Gilbert discussed Mr Wilfred’s case at a meeting in February 2015.
    Six months later, the minister sent a letter asking Mr Gilbert for assistance ”to find a way to allow Mr Wilfred re-entry to the US”.
    Mr Carley’s June paper said: ”In response to your letter, Mr Gilbert advised that he had asked the US State Department again to look into the case.”
    Mr Woodhouse’s press secretary, Yvette McKinley, confirmed Mr Wilfred was not discussed at the June 9 meeting.
    US embassy media specialist Janine Burns said in an emailed statement: ”As you will appreciate, we are very careful with information regarding individuals and their personal circumstances. Unfortunately these privacy considerations mean that we unable to respond to your queries relating to Mr Wilfred, his choices and current situation.”
    Subsequently, Mr Wilfred waived his right to privacy but Ms Burns did not respond further.
    The New Zealand Government has kept Mr Wilfred and his wife, Carolyn Dare Wilfred, apart for more than a year.
    Mrs Dare Wilfred, the heiress of a Canadian food fortune, left the country in August last year when her business visa expired and border officials have suspended her country’s visa waiver.
    She is living in Canada, where she is pursuing an oppression lawsuit against her brothers in a bid to cash up her stake in the family business, Dare Foods.
    In an emailed statement this week, Mr Woodhouse said: ”The barriers to Mr and Mrs Wilfred being reunited in another country are ones Mr Wilfred has imposed on himself. Mr Wilfred is able to remove those barriers at any time, but that’s a matter for him.”
    The minister ignored questions from the Otago Daily Times asking him to explain why it was so important for the Government to deport Mr Wilfred.
    Mr Wilfred said the minister’s comments were a deception, because he was stateless and could not leave.
    ”I don’t belong to the US, so how could they take me back? I’m an alien.”
    Mr Wilfred believed the high-level talks about his statehood explain why the Government had banished his wife from the country.
    ”The reason they want me out of here is two-fold.
    ”One is because I’m an embarrassment to them because they can’t get me out – and they keep thinking that if they gave me any sort of status, that would set a precedent where a whole lot of Americans would come flying in and renounce their citizenship.
    ”And, of course, the other is because I’m at odds with the Clintons, and the Clintons are now coming up for election.”
    Mr Wilfred claimed to be a CIA financial contractor in 1997 and 1998, under Bill Clinton’s presidency.
    He claimed billions of dollars were embezzled to be appropriated for CIA black operations.
    The William J Clinton Foundation, which later became the Clinton Foundation, was established in 1997.
    The Clinton Foundation has come under scrutiny during Mr Clinton’s wife, Hillary’s, bid for the presidency, including questions over the foundation’s acceptance of foreign government donations.
    Mrs Clinton’s campaign officials have been asked for comment.
    Following the ODT’s first story on Mr Wilfred, in May, a member of Mr Woodhouse’s staff, whose name is redacted, asked officials to check if his claims about being a CIA whistleblower had been raised in previous immigration requests, appeals or reviews.
    david.williams@odt.co.nz

    Reply
  8. Harmon Wilfred

    The CIA / Clinton Foundation Covert Money Laundering Connection

    Q: What do you get when you combine the Clinton/CIA global covert funding operation (http://c1412.paas2.tx.modxcloud.com/assets/files/pdfs/trump-open-letter.pdf) with the Clinton Cash Connection? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM)

    A: A politically legitimized billion-dollar global money laundering crime syndicate with the CIA as the enforcement arm. http://www.luminadiem.com

    Hint: The Clinton Foundation was activated during the same year as the CIA/Clinton covert funding partnership became operational.

    I watched the Clinton Cash documentary and it became obvious to me that there is a direct relationship between the completion and funding of the first $15 billion tranche of the Clinton/CIA covert funding deal (“CCF”) in 1999 and the entire Clinton cash strategy. First of all, the Clinton Foundation was first created and funded in 1999, Clinton’s last year as President. It only makes sense that the Clinton’s were using these international deals to launder and invest the money from the CCF through his new found political and corporate syndicate. In the India example, the donor actually admitted that the money contributed to the Foundation was not his.
    The continuation of this process has been assured by the fact that there were originally 32 of these multi-billion dollar bank notes issued of which 11 were assigned to the CIA by 1999 through Central American countries and the balance were in process to be obtained. This was confirmed to me by a meeting in Colorado Springs with a member of the Rothschild family, Shamuel Emanual Abijah (code named ”The Principle”) who met with me in my Colorado Springs office and showed me the 32 notes in high resolution copy and revealed to me at the time that it was his family that caused the original notes to be issued in the 1960”s. Although his family was upset that the CIA had obtained possession of 11 of these notes (bearer bonds), as the bonds were already exposed to private trust intermediaries, they were compelled to cooperate and take part in the deals. The first bond transacted at a value of $15 billion in 1999 was the smallest of the 11 notes scheduled for transaction. I was told that due to the size and nature of each transaction they would initially limit them to one per year.
    It’s easy to see how the Clinton’s would become the brains of the laundering and investment strategy of this operation controlling all transactions through their Foundation and utilising their political clout and their long standing political/corporate syndicate oligarchs to funnel billions throughout the international scene in order to accomplish the covert and overt deals of the organization.
    Regards,
    Harmon Wilfred My email is: harmon@harmonwilfred.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.